Cover to the Secret of the Nagas |
Last July, I wrote this
post and this
post about my fascination to Amish Tripathi’s first book of the Shiva Trilogy: Immortals of Meluha. I
was so impressed by it that i showed the book to one of my best friends (before
reading the whole lot, actually), and I got another Amish fan. We decided to
purchase the second instalment, The Secret of the Naga off eBay or Amazon.
Unfortunately, the only available copies are in India, and they don’t ship
overseas. Why oh why, that is the big question here.
Anyway, after bugging and begging my Indian friend, she sent
me two packs of Immortals of Meluha and The Secret of the Nagas from
Flipkart.com. Two Nagas for myself, one Meluha for my friend, another one for
her friend who wants to read it too. The books arrived last Monday. I delivered
my friend’s share immediately that evening, and started reading that night. I
finished the whole book in three nights, on Wednesday night (actually, half an
hour after midnight of Thursday).
Below is my review and spoilers for ‘The Secret of the
Nagas’. It contains heavy spoilers, so you better stop reading if you plan
to read the book without spoilers. By the way, Naga here refers to people with
deformities, hence outcast by both the Suryavanshi (Meluha) and Chandravanshi
(Swadweep). Naga here doesn’t mean ‘the dragon’, as is in the Indonesian language.
I like The Secret of the Nagas. Unlike its predecessor, Naga
isn’t loaded with romance, perhaps because Shiva has finished chasing Sati. But
it doesn’t mean that Shiva and Sati had grown cold. They are still pretty much
in love, tho they did have their estrangement moments in the Naga book. But the
Naga book itself is more action-packed and filled with more mysteries than the
Meluha book.
I have many favourite characters in Immortals of Meluha. The first one is of course Shiva-ji himself and Lady Sati. I also love Nandi, Veerbhadra and Bhrahaspati. In the second book, Shiva had grown into his role as the Mahadev; taking charge and making difficult decisions. Sati was still the strong woman I love in the first book, plus more. But, unexpectedly, my new favourite characters for The Secret of the Nagas are the Naga himself and the Queen of the Naga.
Huh? How come?... But, but, they are EVIL! They KILL people!
The Naga, as depicted in the Shiva Trilogy trailers |
Truthfully, when I was reading Meluha, I was already
ambiguous with the Naga character, for although the earlier description f his
portrayed him as a ruthless killer, he unexpectedly saved two women from being
eaten by crocodiles. The Naga also displayed some hurt and disappointment,
uncharacteristic of cold-blooded killer. Amazon’s spoilers of the first few
pages of The Secret of the Nagas also showed him displaying concern over Sati’s
minor injuries. Seriously, at one point, I actually thought that the Naga
fancied Sati!
Then, as I read the Naga book further, I realised that this
character really isn’t what we’ve been shown so far. Yes, he has killed. But
there’s more to it than meets the eye. Is he actually someone we’ve been introduced
to in the first book? My bet went to Brahaspati, the chief scientist of Meluha, who suffered terrible death
during the destruction of Mt Mandar. It was a fishy event. The Somra-producing
factory in Mt Mandar was obliterated. Shiva and his troop found so many
unidentified body parts. True, there was gruesome death. But wouldn’t it be
easy to fabricate the death of a person under such circumstances?
But if Brahaspati was THE Naga, what was his motive? And it
actually cannot be, because the Naga had been described without his mask, and
he did have deformities (thus, he was labelled as a Naga). Would Brahaspati be
the main leader of the Naga, then? Despite his appearance as a normal person?
But apparently, it wasn’t the case. After the birth of his
and Sati’s son (named Kartik, after Sati’s confidant Kritikka) in Kashi, Shiva
departed to Branga to find more lead about the Nagas. Sati and Kartik were left
behind because Kartik wasn’t old enough for long distance travel. While Shiva was
in Branga (and encountered a bandit-turned-devotee called Parshuram), Sati had several adventures of her own. One of them
involving a large group of lions attacking a village in the Kashi territory.
Since the lions already killed people, Sati decided to help. Yet, she
underestimated the size and ferocity of the lions (led by a liger, a breed
between a tiger and a lioness). Sati almost met her death if not rescued by the
Naga leader and his troops.
Then, the second biggest secret of this second book was
revealed.
SPOILERS HERE!
The Naga’s mask fell during the fight (he was actually badly
injured too), revealing a man whose head was the head of an elephant. Sati was
stunned (not as stunned as I was), particularly when the Naga claimed that his
ugly feature was the reason behind Sati’s abandonment.
Yes, Ladies and Gents, the Naga was actually Sati’s elder
son. Thought to be stillborn (an event which led to Sati being labelled as a
Vikrama, an outcast), the baby was actually alive. However, due to his
‘deformity’, Emperor Daksha sent the baby to Panchavati and fabricated a story
about the stillborn baby. Sati was then labelled a Vikrama; but that was (at least to Daksha)
considered a better fate than being exiled to Panchavati with her
‘deformed’ son.
A beautiful wooden statue of Lord Ganesh |
After the Naga’s form was revealed, it was easy for me to guess what his real name was. Ganesh. My favourite Lord Ganesh, the Removal of Obstacles, Lord of Wisdom. But this Ganesh wasn’t the pacifier and happy-go-lucky God that I usually worship. This Ganesh was bitter due to the injustice he had experienced since his birth. I feel really sorry for him, for he really didn’t deserve to be treated like an outcast (who did, who does, by the way?).
Apparently, Ganesh wasn’t the only family who had been
hidden from Sati’s knowledge. Turned out, Sati had a twin sister, who had deformities
of her own, hence being exiled to Panchavati since birth. The sister had dark
skin, exoskeleton and a second pair of hands. Guess the name of the sister?
Yep, Kali.
In the story, Kali was the Queen of the Naga; Ganesh was her
second in command. After learning about them, Sati brought Kali and Ganesh to Kashi
and waited for Shiva there. Ganesh objected the idea, for he was a Naga, and
how could Shiva love a Naga as his son? Sati wisely replied, ‘You don’t know
the size of your father’s heart. The entire world can live in it.’
Yet, Ganesh was the main suspect behind Brahaspati’s death.
Sati overlooked this fact when she introduced her eldest son to Shiva later
after her husband returned from Branga. And while Shiva had no problem
accepting Kali as part of his family, he was so shocked to find that Ganesh had
the eyes of the Naga who had always caused him trouble in the past. Ganesh was
definitely behind the destruction of Mt Mandar and Brahaspati’s demise. Shiva
was livid. The only reason that stopped him from killing Ganesh was the fact
that the Naga was Sati’s own son.
Lady Parvati and her son Ganesh |
Poor Ganesh. In this book, I really feel for him. It’s not
his fault that he was exiled from Meluha. I admit I didn’t get why he had to
destroy Mt Mandar and kill Brahaspati, the Meluha chief scientist (I suspect
there was more than meets the eye here). But I can also understand that Shiva
treasured Brahaspati like a brother and he found the chief scientist’s death so
difficult to overcome. Yes, I wish he would ask Ganesh why the Naga had to kill
Brahaspati, instead of just destroying the Somra factory. Yes, I wish that the
Neelkanth (Shiva’s moniker due to his blue throat) would try to overcome his
anger and reason with Ganesh. Ganesh actually almost died protecting his half-brother
Kartik from another lion attack. He called Shiva ‘Baba’ once out of respect and
desire to have a normal family. But for Shiva, those acts didn’t overweight the
fact that Ganesh attacked Mt Mandar and killed Brahaspati. Shiva simply
couldn’t forgive Ganesh.
I admit that I am a bit disappointed with Shiva here. His
actions were understandable, but my attachment to Ganesh made me wish Shiva had
reacted better. But, had I lived in that period, having no reference of Ganesh
as the deity who removes obstacles, knowing only what Shiva knew, and I was so
attached to Brahaspati the way Shiva was, I might want to wring Ganesh’ neck as
well. At least, keeping a distance from him. So I guess, Shiva’s attitude was plausible.
Doesn’t stop me from thinking that in this book the Mahadev was not at his best though. True, Shiva confronted Daksha about Kali and Ganesh, and because of that, Daksha admitted in front of his family that he did exile his other daughter and grandson. True, Shiva still loved Sati and really cared for her happiness. But somehow, his persistence of not forgiving Ganesh made me a bit disappointed at the Mahadev here. Come on Shiva-ji, at least hear the other part of the story first?
But I guess that’s what it is. In this book, Shiva was a
human, not a god. He must learn from his mistakes, he must look beyond his
prejudices to understand his true role. Shiva hasn’t finished that journey yet.
He had learned from his mistakes in the Meluha book, hence he didn’t just
decapitate Ganesh. But he still maintained cold shoulder whenever Ganesh was
around, and that alone was enough to make me want to hug the elephant-head
Ganesh. Poor baby...
Well, at least Ganesh got the best of it in the end. At the final chapter, several twists happened. The largest one was the appearance of the one Shiva thought he lost in the first book. Not going to tell who, but you can guess already. This person’s appearance automatically negated all the blames Ganesh had to take for himself. It will be interesting to see how Shiva ‘redeemed’ himself to Ganesh. He had been giving the poor boy cold shoulder so far. Shiva will apologise, alright. That was what he said to Bhagirath when he found the Swadweepan Prince did nothing wrong. ‘If I have made a mistake, I must apologise.’
The Ganesh and Kali revelation was not the only surprise in
The Secret of the Nagas. Many mysteries started to appear here. Daksha seemed
to be true to his Puranic character: two-faced and weak. The Chandravanshi
Emperor Dilipa wasn’t that much of a difference either. A new character
appeared here called Sage Bhrigu. Historically, Bhrigu was a fine and commendable
sage. But in the Trilogy, I think Bhrigu had something nasty in his brain, and
he did not hesitate to involve Daksha and Dilipa in the whole mess!
Shiva and Ganesh in
the puranas
The Secret of the Nagas clearly depicted Shiva’s
uncomfortable relationship with Ganesh. I actually think Amish was faithful to a
popular version of the Shiva- Ganesh early relationship. Although Varaha
Purana explained that Shiva created Ganesh from his laughter (a much better
story, I guess), other Puranas told how their early relationship WAS rocky.
According to some puranas
composed on 600 CE onwards, Sati cloned Ganesh (a perfect human boy) from
herself when Shiva was away and ordered the boy to safeguard her house while
she was taking a shower. When Shiva came home after his trip, he found Ganesh
barricading the door and not letting him enter the house to see his wife. Both
imagining the worst, a fight eventually broke between the two powerful deities
which led to Shiva decapitating Ganesh’ head either with his third eye beam or
trident. Some versions would say it was
an accident, others said it was intentional. Still, when Shiva found out from a
bereft Parvati that the headless boy was her own son, Shiva was devastated too.
He tried to find the boy’s head to make him whole again, but couldn’t find the
head. Hence, with the help of Visnu, Shiva replaced the boy’s head with the
head of a young elephant.
Ganesh worshipping a lingga (representation of Shiva) |
The relationship between Shiva and Ganesh became better
afterwards; Ganesh saw Shiva as his own father, and Shiva doted Ganesh very
much. The Mahadev allowed Ganesh to play with the moon adorning his matted
hair. Ganesh worshipped his parents so much, such that during a race to circle
the world three times with his brother Kartik, Ganesh chose to circumambulate
his parents instead of running across the globe as what Kartik did. When asked
why he did that, the Elephant-head God said that to him, his parents are his
world. Thus he circled Shiva and Parvati (Sati-reincarnated) instead of the
Earth.
I personally think the Shiva-Ganesh early conflict was a
symbolism. Many stories in the Purana are not to be taken verbatim, IMO. I think
the ‘beheading’ of Ganesh was a symbol of getting rid of ego. Or perhaps
replacing blind faith (Ganesh faithfully followed Parvati’s order not to let
anyone enter the room, although Shiva had said that he was her husband) with discernment (Ganesh’ elephant
head represents, among others, listening, searching within and viveka/discernment).
On the other hand, I think Shiva was also presented with a lesson of open-mindedness
in the whole fiasco. Had he listened and talked nicely with Ganesh instead of
attacking the boy, the whole incident might not happen.
I’m very curious of how Shiva would approach Ganesh in the
third and last book. Being the fair person he was, I think Shiva will humbly apologise
to Ganesh. Being the humble Ganesh, I think the elephant-head warrior will just
refuse to put Shiva in the blame and let bygone be bygone. If Amish try to
incorporate the Purana aspects, Shiva and Ganesh will develop a much better
relationship as father and son. I think Ganesh will be declared Shiva’s second
in command or something like that in The Oath of the Vayuputra.
Some quibbles
I do have some quibbles for The Secret of the Nagas. First,
I wish Amish would establish who his characters were when he reintroduced them
in the first chapters, or the first time the characters reappeared. For main
characters like Shiva and Sati, something like ‘Shiva, the Tibetan tribal
leader-turned Mahadev’ and ‘Sati, the Princess of the Meluhan Empire and
beloved wife of Shiva’ will do. For secondary characters like Drapaku, in the
absence of extra information, I had to remember who Drapaku was when I first
read him again in the Naga book. It would be nice to know that ‘Drapaku, the
former Vikrama from XX town whom Shiva liberated when he banned the Vikrama law
a few years back’ will do very well. If
it is too much of a trouble, a character list placed before Chapter 1 would
also help the readers.
Map of the Shiva Trilogy world (ca 1,900 BC) |
Secondly, this is also for the first book; I wish Amish would
give the whole region another name instead of ‘India’. I of course may be wrong
here, but I am certain that the name ‘India’ had not been used circa 2,000
years BC. There was a stretch of land called Meluha (or Mohenjodaro-Harappa,
covering modern Pakistan and the western part of the modern India), a stretch
of land called Swadweep (covering eastern part of modern India, some Himalayan
regions, and also a bit of Bangladesh), another stretch of land called the
Dandak Forest where Panchavati City was (now is where south India is), and a
piece of no-man’s land in the middle. Amish calls the four parts of the Asia
subcontinent ‘India’ and I find it hard to digest. I prefer him calling it the Hindustan as the Persians
called the Indian subcontinent a few thousand years BC. The Persians meant to
refer to the River Sindh/Indus when they said ‘hindu’. Thus, when the Persians said ‘Hindustan’, they
referred to the people living beyond the Indus (from Persia).
However, according to Wiki, Hindustan was also mentioned in
the Barhaspatya Samhita of the Rgveda (ca 1,700 – 1,100 BC) as follows: ‘The
country which starts from Himalayas and the borders of which reach till the
Indian Ocean (Indu Sarovaram), has been created by devas and its name is
Hindusthan’. We can use the name Bharat as well, which
was already around 1-2 millennia BC. Due to these historical perspectives, I
prefer to use Hindustan or Bharat instead of India (Herodotus started
to use that name ca 5th century BC).
Nevertheless, despite the quibbles, I still love The Secret of
the Nagas. It reminded me how much I love Shiva and Sati, and how I adore
Ganesh and Kali. I actually cannot wait for the Oath of the Vayuputra to be
published. However, patience is virtue. And since Amish has stated that he
simply is an observer to events in a parallel universe, I’d rather him taking
his time and record the events as faithfully as possible, rather than trying to
appease fans like myself. I do hope that Sarasvati the Lady of
Knowledge will always guide him in his writing, I mean, recording process.
Edit 10 Oct 2013:
After 6 months, I finally finished my review of the 'Oath of the Vayuputras'. Click here to read it (also contains a short fan-fiction).
Edit 10 Oct 2013:
After 6 months, I finally finished my review of the 'Oath of the Vayuputras'. Click here to read it (also contains a short fan-fiction).
1 comment:
very nice..... About puttin the character list .... In the front pages
Post a Comment